<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Uranium Stocks &#124; Canadian List News &#187; Uranium News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://uranium-stocks.ca/index.php/category/uranium-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://uranium-stocks.ca</link>
	<description>Updates on Uranium Stocks, News &#038; Views, etc</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 22:14:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Cameco Q1 Earnings (2010)</title>
		<link>http://uranium-stocks.ca/index.php/cameco-q1-earnings-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://uranium-stocks.ca/index.php/cameco-q1-earnings-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 22:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uranium News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uranium Stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ccj]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uranium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earnings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forecast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outlook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recommendation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uranium-stocks.ca/?p=136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cameco reported Q1 earnings on May 4th. 
Some of the highlights include
Total Earnings of $142 Million (vs $82 in 2009)
The Majority of these gains were due to mark-to-market gains on financial instruments. In 2009 these instruments lost $24 million. In 2010 they gained $31 Million
The Adjusted Net Earnings were $111 million. In 2009 they were [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cameco reported Q1 earnings on May 4th. </p>
<p>Some of the highlights include</p>
<li>Total Earnings of $142 Million (vs $82 in 2009)</li>
<li>The Majority of these gains were due to mark-to-market gains on financial instruments. In 2009 these instruments lost $24 million. In 2010 they gained $31 Million</li>
<li>The Adjusted Net Earnings were $111 million. In 2009 they were $103 million</li>
<li>CCJ attributes the 8% gain to profits from fuel services business &#038; electricity business</li>
<li>On the downside earnings from the core business, Uranium, were down due to lower sales volume and lowered realized prices due to the rise in the Canadian dollar visa-via American currency.</li>
<p>CEO Jerry Grandey shared the following quote:</p>
<blockquote><p>The long-term fundamentals of the nuclear industry are positive. Cameco is prudently investing today in production growth and new technology to pursue our vision to be a dominant nuclear energy company. </p></blockquote>
<p>A week later Cameco shares are trading relatively flat ($24.61 pre-announcement to $24.65 one week prior).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://uranium-stocks.ca/index.php/cameco-q1-earnings-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s Nuclear Announcement and Uranium ETF&#8217;s</title>
		<link>http://uranium-stocks.ca/index.php/obamas-nuclear-announcement-and-uranium-etfs/</link>
		<comments>http://uranium-stocks.ca/index.php/obamas-nuclear-announcement-and-uranium-etfs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 19:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uranium News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uranium Stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ccj]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[etf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uranium]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uranium-stocks.ca/?p=132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week Obama made an announcement that gave hope to stagnant Uranium stocks. He made a commitment to current and future loans to advance the United States nuclear energy position.

Via Investopedia
This past week, President Obama announced an $8.3 billion loan guarantee for the first new nuclear power plant to be constructed in 27 years&#8230;The case [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week Obama made an announcement that gave hope to stagnant Uranium stocks. He made a commitment to current and future loans to advance the United States nuclear energy position.</p>
<p><span id="more-132"></span></p>
<p>Via Investopedia</p>
<blockquote><p>This past week, President Obama announced an $8.3 billion loan guarantee for the first new nuclear power plant to be constructed in 27 years&#8230;The case for nuclear energy is gaining steam in the U.S. as the president wants to triple the previous loan guarantee program to nearly $54 billion dollars and develop a plan for dealing with the generated waste.</p></blockquote>
<p>Nuclear power plant producers have witnessed a nice push upwards after the announcement, yet actual Uranium U308 plays have received less than stellar bumps. </p>
<p>For example Denison gained less than 1%. Cameco pushed up only 3%. One way to gain full exposure to the overall nuclear energy category, yet not be fully exposed to the up-down nature of uranium stocks is to enter an ETF. </p>
<p>Market Vectors Nuclear Energy ETF (ticker NLR). Here are the funds top 10 holdings as of Feb 22nd, 2010:</p>
<div style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://uranium-stocks.ca/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/uraniumuranium-ETF.png" alt="uranium-ETF.png" border="0" width="364" height="315" /></div>
<p>As we can see the ETF does hold a large percentage of familiar names. Here&#8217;s the breakdown of the fund on a percentage basis.</p>
<div style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://uranium-stocks.ca/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/uraniumuranium-etf-breakdown.png" alt="uranium-etf-breakdown.png" border="0" width="279" height="193" /></div>
<p>With expense ratio&#8217;s capped at 0.65% this ETF offers an attractive option for those looking to expand out into the nuclear industry, all the while not being tied exclusively to uranium plays.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://uranium-stocks.ca/index.php/obamas-nuclear-announcement-and-uranium-etfs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Denison CEO: Spot Prices to Remain Flat for 2009</title>
		<link>http://uranium-stocks.ca/index.php/denison-ceo-spot-prices-to-remain-flat-for-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://uranium-stocks.ca/index.php/denison-ceo-spot-prices-to-remain-flat-for-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 03:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uranium News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uranium Stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downgrades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spot price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Downgrade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stock Market]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uranium-stocks.ca/?p=127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Thursday Denison CEO Ron Hochstein predicted that uranium spot prices would remain at current price levels until the end of the calendar year.

Regarding the most recent earnings loss ($91.3 million in third quarter) the Denison CEO said the following:
On the uranium side, it&#8217;s not that we couldn&#8217;t sell, but we used our discretion and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Thursday Denison CEO Ron Hochstein predicted that uranium spot prices would remain at current price levels until the end of the calendar year.</p>
<p><span id="more-127"></span></p>
<p>Regarding the most recent earnings loss ($91.3 million in third quarter) the Denison CEO said the following:</p>
<blockquote><p>On the uranium side, it&#8217;s not that we couldn&#8217;t sell, but we used our discretion and chose not to sell into the spot market during the traditionally slow summer period.</p></blockquote>
<p>Spot prices current hover around $45 and $47. </p>
<p>Currently Denison share prices sit at $1.40. The somewhat recent <a href="http://uranium-stocks.ca/index.php/denison-drops-10-mid-day/">Denison downgrade</a> by RBC (from $1.70 to $1.25) on October 1st is starting to look rather prophetic  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://uranium-stocks.ca/index.php/denison-ceo-spot-prices-to-remain-flat-for-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paladin Energy Hires New CFO, Downgraded</title>
		<link>http://uranium-stocks.ca/index.php/paladin-energy-hires-new-cfo-downgraded/</link>
		<comments>http://uranium-stocks.ca/index.php/paladin-energy-hires-new-cfo-downgraded/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 22:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Paladin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uranium News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uranium Stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downgrades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Downgrade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uranium]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uranium-stocks.ca/?p=124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Australian Uranium producer Paladin Energy has been in the headlines this week, hiring a new CFO and receiving a downgrade from RBS.

In a press release sent out on November 2nd, Paladin announced the appointment of Garry Korte as CFO. He will begin his new role on November 16th. From the press release:
Garry brings a broad [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Australian Uranium producer Paladin Energy has been in the headlines this week, hiring a new CFO and receiving a downgrade from RBS.</p>
<p><span id="more-124"></span></p>
<p>In a press release sent out on November 2nd, Paladin announced the appointment of Garry Korte as CFO. He will begin his new role on November 16th. From the press release:</p>
<blockquote><p>Garry brings a broad range of finance skills to the Company and we believe his corporate finance, commercial and international experience will add value as Paladin continues to grow.</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>Earnings Downgrade</strong></p>
<p>Despite the timing, the downgrade of Paladin was unrelated to the hiring of Garry Korte . RBS analyst Lyndon Fagan lowered his earnings forecast by 46%, all the way down to $14.4 million in American currency. The reasoning behind this was his expectation of Paladin not being able to meet production forecasts. He bases his assumption on historical misses and lowered investor confidence. From Fagan:</p>
<blockquote><p>‘Missing targets over the last two years has resulted in negative sentiment, and a general lack of investor confidence in delivery of future production. In our view, this is the reason the stock is now trading below our fair value.’’</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://uranium-stocks.ca/index.php/paladin-energy-hires-new-cfo-downgraded/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Denison Drops 10% on RBC Downgrade</title>
		<link>http://uranium-stocks.ca/index.php/denison-drops-10-mid-day/</link>
		<comments>http://uranium-stocks.ca/index.php/denison-drops-10-mid-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 18:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uranium News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uranium Stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downgrades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uranium Ore]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uranium-stocks.ca/?p=110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Uranium producer Denison has had a wild couple of days, finding itself up 8% on Wednesday and down 10% on Thursday. Both moves were based upon fresh news reports.
The Story:
Coming across the newswire at the beginning of the Sept 30th session was an announcement from Denison. They will begin a 7500 metre drill program on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uranium producer Denison has had a wild couple of days, finding itself up 8% on Wednesday and down 10% on Thursday. Both moves were based upon fresh news reports.<span id="more-110"></span></p>
<p>The Story:</p>
<p>Coming across the newswire at the beginning of the Sept 30th session was an announcement from Denison. They will begin a 7500 metre drill program on the Wheeler River Property located in northern Saskatchewan.</p>
<p>The Wheeler property itself is a joint venture with three other companies. Denison controls 60% of the interest, Cameco 30% and JCU Exploration owns the final 10%.</p>
<p>The budget for the drill program is $1.5 million. 15 holes will be drilled. </p>
<p>The market itself reacted favourably during the Sept 30th session and in after-market trading. But the following morning RBC cut their DNN price target from $1.70 all of the way down to $1.25. This represents more than a 35% cut.</p>
<p>This has impacted the stock in the short-term trading, as DNN is down close to 10% on higher than average volume during the October 1st session.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://uranium-stocks.ca/index.php/denison-drops-10-mid-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paladin Energy raises $419 million</title>
		<link>http://uranium-stocks.ca/index.php/paladin-energy-raises-419-million/</link>
		<comments>http://uranium-stocks.ca/index.php/paladin-energy-raises-419-million/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 19:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Paladin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uranium Acquistions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uranium News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uranium Stocks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uranium-stocks.ca/index.php/paladin-energy-raises-419-million/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On September 10th Paladin Energy raised $419 million. Theses additional funds are earmarked for acquisitions and further exploration.
Paladin raised the money via a institutional private placement of 93.45 million shares, priced at $4.60 AU. This represented a 6.1% discount vs closing share prices earlier on September 9th.
The company looks to use the new funds to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On September 10th Paladin Energy raised $419 million. Theses additional funds are earmarked for acquisitions and further exploration.</p>
<p>Paladin raised the money via a institutional private placement of 93.45 million shares, priced at $4.60 AU. This represented a 6.1% discount vs closing share prices earlier on September 9th.</p>
<p>The company looks to use the new funds to advance exploration and possibly to fund acquisitions.</p>
<p>The North American markets haven&#8217;t reacted to this move with much fervour. Outside of September 8th pink sheet Paladin share volume has remained at average levels. </p>
<p>Quote from chief executive John Borshoff</p>
<blockquote><p>“Paladin believes that with its balance sheet strength and development expertise, the company is well placed to partner both junior uranium companies and downstream companies seeking to commercialize uranium opportunities.” </p></blockquote>
<p><span id="more-81"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://uranium-stocks.ca/index.php/paladin-energy-raises-419-million/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spot Price Swings &amp; USEC Bounceback</title>
		<link>http://uranium-stocks.ca/index.php/spot-price-swings-usec-bounceback/</link>
		<comments>http://uranium-stocks.ca/index.php/spot-price-swings-usec-bounceback/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 19:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uranium News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uranium Stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ccj]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spot price]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uranium-stocks.ca/index.php/spot-price-swings-usec-bounceback/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Spot Price Swings &#038; USEC Bounceback

Spot Price Swings
Last week spot prices took a big hit, losing over 10% of its value, dropping $5 to a U3O8 price of $47 per pound. 
Yet this did not seem to affect share prices, as the majority of Uranium stocks stayed within 3% of their previous weeks prices.

This week [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1><center>Spot Price Swings &#038; USEC Bounceback</h1>
<p></center></p>
<h2>Spot Price Swings</h2>
<p>Last week spot prices took a big hit, losing over 10% of its value, dropping $5 to a U3O8 price of $47 per pound. </p>
<p>Yet this did not seem to affect share prices, as the majority of Uranium stocks stayed within 3% of their previous weeks prices.</p>
<p><span id="more-78"></span></p>
<p>This week the spot price gained back a portion of its previous losses, gaining a $1.50 to close at $48.50.</p>
<p>Until we witness tangible shifts in share prices that correlate with movements in the spot price we will shift our focus away from spot price fluctuations. </p>
<h2>USEC Bounceback</h2>
<div style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://uranium-stocks.ca///mnt/w0707/d33/s19/b0289d90/www/uranium-stocks.ca///wp-content/uploads/2009/08/uraniumhomer-usec.jpg" alt="homer-usec.jpg" border="0" width="320" height="206" /></div>
<p>The so-called media frenzy on the &#8216;hammering&#8217; of Uranium shares following the USEC denied loan news appears to be over-blown.</p>
<p>From July 29th Tickerspy</p>
<blockquote><p>Uranium stocks got hammered on Wednesday after the Department of Energy denied USEC&#8217;s request for $2 billion in loan guarantees.</p></blockquote>
<p>Share Prices on July 28th and August 4th</p>
<p>Paladin: $3.99, $3.95<br />
Denison: $1.72, $1.69<br />
Cameco: $27.35, $28.56</p>
<p>Hardly the sector-wide destruction that some of the bears were anticipated. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://uranium-stocks.ca/index.php/spot-price-swings-usec-bounceback/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Uranium outperforming a hot market</title>
		<link>http://uranium-stocks.ca/index.php/uranium-outperforming-a-hot-market/</link>
		<comments>http://uranium-stocks.ca/index.php/uranium-outperforming-a-hot-market/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 23:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uranium News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uranium Stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ccj]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uranium-stocks.ca/index.php/uranium-outperforming-a-hot-market/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#8217;re long in the market the past few weeks have been a god send. However, even the hot stock market can&#8217;t match the recent gains of uranium giant Cameco.

Below is a percentage gain chart via Yahoo Finance. Cameco is represented by the blue line, the Dow in red.

Ok, so CCJ isn&#8217;t beating the Dow [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re long in the market the past few weeks have been a god send. However, even the hot stock market can&#8217;t match the recent gains of uranium giant Cameco.</p>
<p><span id="more-76"></span></p>
<p>Below is a percentage gain chart via Yahoo Finance. Cameco is represented by the blue line, the Dow in red.</p>
<div style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://uranium-stocks.ca///mnt/w0707/d33/s19/b0289d90/www/uranium-stocks.ca///wp-content/uploads/2009/07/uraniumuraniumvsmarket.png" alt="uraniumvsmarket.png" border="0" width="598" height="239" /></div>
<p>Ok, so CCJ isn&#8217;t beating the Dow by much. But it&#8217;s still beating it. For the year it&#8217;s not even close, CCJ is dominating the markets. Of course, as a Uranium trader you already knew this&#8230; Still, with recent market fluctuations it&#8217;s a welcome change to be celebrating overall market strength. </p>
<p>The next few weeks should be an interesting time for the sector. Hilary Clinton is making a visit to India to discuss nuclear rectors and technology. And on August 12th Cameco will present earnings. Can the sector maintain it&#8217;s strength? The next few weeks should help us forecast the remainder of 2009 for the industry. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://uranium-stocks.ca/index.php/uranium-outperforming-a-hot-market/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paladin Update</title>
		<link>http://uranium-stocks.ca/index.php/paladin-update-2/</link>
		<comments>http://uranium-stocks.ca/index.php/paladin-update-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 20:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Paladin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uranium News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uranium Stocks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uranium-stocks.ca/index.php/paladin-update-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paladin Update
 
It&#8217;s been close to two months since we lasted looked in on Paladin Energy. Let&#8217;s see how shares have done during that stretch.

Last time around (April 24th) Paladin shares closed at $3.17. Since that time shares have trended upwards on a steady pace. After a stellar earnings report;
Paladin said the result reflected improved [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1><center>Paladin Update</h1>
<p></center> </p>
<p>It&#8217;s been close to two months since we lasted looked in on Paladin Energy. Let&#8217;s see how shares have done during that stretch.</p>
<div style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://uranium-stocks.ca///mnt/w0707/d33/s19/b0289d90/www/uranium-stocks.ca///wp-content/uploads/2009/04/uraniumlogo-paladin.gif" alt="logo_paladin.gif" border="0" width="375" height="160" /></div>
<p>Last time around (April 24th) Paladin shares closed at $3.17. Since that time shares have trended upwards on a steady pace. After a stellar earnings report;</p>
<blockquote><p>Paladin said the result reflected improved operating performance at its flagship Langer Heinrich uranium project in Namibia, where production was up 40 per cent for the quarter to 685.874 pounds of uranium.</p></blockquote>
<p>And a subsequent volume increase, shares rose. On May 28th shares broke through the $4 resistance level and maintained that level on and off up until June 11th. Over the past couple of days (writing as of June 18th) shares have taken a pretty substantial hit, falling from $4.27 on June 12th to a current level of $3.65, a level that hasn&#8217;t been seen in close to one month. </p>
<p>Let&#8217;s see what happens with shares over the next five or six trading sessions. Can Paladin continue to ride positive momentum or are investors cashing out on some of the recent 2009 share profits?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://uranium-stocks.ca/index.php/paladin-update-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BMO rates Cameco as outperform with a $35 price target</title>
		<link>http://uranium-stocks.ca/index.php/bmo-rates-cameco-as-outperform-with-a-35-price-target/</link>
		<comments>http://uranium-stocks.ca/index.php/bmo-rates-cameco-as-outperform-with-a-35-price-target/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 16:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uranium News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uranium Stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ccj]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uranium-stocks.ca/index.php/bmo-rates-cameco-as-outperform-with-a-35-price-target/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
BMO sets $35 price target for Cameco

At the tail-end of last week BMO Capital Markets analyst Edward Stereck came out with some bullish comments regarding Cameco Corp.


In Stereck&#8217;s commentary for his initiated coverage of Cameco he stated the following:
Cameco&#8217;s leading role in uranium production and diversified nuclear asset base makes it well-placed to capitalize on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><center><br />
<h1>BMO sets $35 price target for Cameco</h1>
<p></center></p>
<p>At the tail-end of last week BMO Capital Markets analyst Edward Stereck came out with some bullish comments regarding Cameco Corp.</p>
<div style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://uranium-stocks.ca///mnt/w0707/d33/s19/b0289d90/www/uranium-stocks.ca///wp-content/uploads/2009/05/uraniumtoplogon.gif" alt="toplogon.gif" border="0" width="267" height="38" /></div>
<p><span id="more-72"></span></p>
<p>In Stereck&#8217;s commentary for his initiated coverage of Cameco he stated the following:</p>
<blockquote><p>Cameco&#8217;s leading role in uranium production and diversified nuclear asset base makes it well-placed to capitalize on forecast growth in the nuclear industry over the coming years and decades</p></blockquote>
<p>He rated the stock as outperform and placed a 12 month price target of $35 per share (US). In the report Stereck also stated that the stock is expensive when compared to its peers (listing Paladin) but this premium is acceptable due to the size and market share of Cameco. </p>
<p>With the recent run up in share prices for Uranium stocks across the board a report such as this can only be viewed as positive (for bulls at least) for Cameco and Uranium share holders. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://uranium-stocks.ca/index.php/bmo-rates-cameco-as-outperform-with-a-35-price-target/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
